A Tinny Speaker Is Not Automatically a Codec Problem
Field feedback described the speaker as very tinny even though the digital call path was working.
Field feedback described the speaker as very tinny even though the digital call path was working.
Microphone count changes acoustics, PCB, enclosure, DSP assumptions and factory test.
One strong call can prove a candidate is promising but not that it is ready for manufacturing or field release.
A rebuffer/AEC/volume experiment produced obvious bad crackle instead of the intended stability improvement.
Later queue, PLC and timer experiments looked more sophisticated on paper but repeatedly introduced crackle, echo or additional delay.
Acoustic complaints have to be separated into source, amplifier, transducer and enclosure effects.
Listening tests become more useful when the input and operating point are controlled.
After digital timing became stable, echo increased at high speaker volume and could no longer be treated as only a network or queue problem.
A delayed copy of far-end speech and an unstable acoustic loop require different diagnosis.
AEC has finite cancellation authority when the speaker physically couples strongly into the microphones.
A working phone is not a release unless the exact artifact and source context can survive the next experiment.